<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Noel Schutt &#187; science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://schutt.org/blog/tag/science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://schutt.org/blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:07:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Debunking</title>
		<link>http://schutt.org/blog/2011/12/debunking/</link>
		<comments>http://schutt.org/blog/2011/12/debunking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 13:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debunking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schutt.org/blog/?p=1611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As someone who enjoys debunking myths and misconceptions, I found The Debunking Handbook by John Cook and Stephan Lewandowsky interesting. It is only six pages long, but includes some tips that will be useful for teaching in general as well as in debunking efforts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.skepticalscience.com/Debunking-Handbook-now-freely-available-download.html"><img src="http://schutt.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/debunking_hb.gif" alt="" title="The Debunking Handbook" width="125" height="177" class="alignright size-full wp-image-1612" /></a></p>
<p>As someone who enjoys debunking myths and misconceptions, I found <a href="http://www.skepticalscience.com/Debunking-Handbook-now-freely-available-download.html"><em>The Debunking Handbook</em></a> by <a href="http://www.skepticalscience.com/about.shtml">John Cook</a> and <a href="http://www.cogsciwa.com/">Stephan Lewandowsky</a> interesting. It is only six pages long, but includes some tips that will be useful for teaching in general as well as in debunking efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://schutt.org/blog/2011/12/debunking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quotes about the New Atheists</title>
		<link>http://schutt.org/blog/2011/03/new-atheists/</link>
		<comments>http://schutt.org/blog/2011/03/new-atheists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 17:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Atheists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schutt.org/blog/?p=1175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[The New Atheist's] embarrassing incapacity for philosophical reasoning &#8230; that raises the wild non-sequitur almost to the level of a dialectical method David Bentley Hart in Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies, as quoted by Ian H. Hutchinson in the article Engaging Today’s Militant Atheist Arguments. The same article quotes Terry Eagleton [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>[The New Atheist's] embarrassing incapacity for philosophical reasoning &#8230; that raises the wild non-sequitur almost to the level of a dialectical method</p></blockquote>
<p>David Bentley Hart in <em>Atheist Delusions: The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies</em>, as quoted by Ian H. Hutchinson in the article <a href="http://biologos.org/blog/engaging-todays-militant-atheist-arguments-part-1/">Engaging Today’s Militant Atheist Arguments</a>. The same article quotes Terry Eagleton as writing:</p>
<blockquote><p>Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://schutt.org/blog/2011/03/new-atheists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Darwin Day</title>
		<link>http://schutt.org/blog/2010/02/darwin-day/</link>
		<comments>http://schutt.org/blog/2010/02/darwin-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 19:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Noel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schutt.org/blog/?p=555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since today is Darwin Day, I&#8217;d like to take the opportunity to recommend Darwin&#8217;s Forgotten Defenders by David N. Livingstone. This short book is a good history of the early scientific debate over natural selection. Unlike the incessant popular portrayal of a war between religion and science, Livingstone shows that the debate was actually over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://schutt.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/darwinsforgottendefenders.jpg"><img src="http://schutt.org/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/darwinsforgottendefenders.jpg" alt="Darwin&#039;s Forgotten Defenders cover" title="Darwin&#039;s Forgotten Defenders cover" class="alignright size-full wp-image-562" /></a>Since today is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_Day" title="Darwin Day on Wikipedia">Darwin Day</a>, I&#8217;d like to take the opportunity to recommend <em><a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=zcXOdWRo9EgC&#038;dq=Darwin’s+Forgotten+Defenders+by+David+N.+Livingstone">Darwin&#8217;s Forgotten Defenders</a></em> by David N. Livingstone. This short book is a good history of the early scientific debate over natural selection. Unlike the incessant popular portrayal of a war between religion and science, Livingstone shows that the debate was actually over the scientific merits of Darwin&#8217;s theory:</p>
<blockquote><p>The fact is, however, that the historical conflict between science and Christianity is historical only in the sense that it is the creation of historians.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is an important point that needs to be understood by more people. Far from being the historical Christian view, Young Earth Creationism did not gain wide popularity until after the 1961 publication of Whitcomb and Morris&#8217; book <em>The Genesis Flood</em>. The spread of the ideas in Whitcomb and Morris&#8217; book contributed to the wide acceptance of a distorted view of the early debates over natural selection. This view has become so prevalent that even many christians do not realize that the Young Earth Creationism and a war between religion and science is not the historical Christian perspective, but a recent development. Livingstone&#8217;s book is a welcome contribution to correcting this myth.</p>
<p>Now, to find a good book on Galileo&#8230;</p>
<p>BibTeX citation:</p>
<pre>@book{Livingstone:1987,
	Author = {<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_N._Livingstone" title="David N Livingstone on Wikipedia">David N. Livingstone</a>},
	Publisher = {William B. Eerdmans and Scottish Academic Press},
	Title = {Darwin's Forgotten Defenders: The Encounter Between
	             Evangelical Theology and Evolutionary Thought},
	Year = {1987}
}</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://schutt.org/blog/2010/02/darwin-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

